Page 1

SWI
Statewide Intake Overview

Statewide Intake serves as the “front door to the front line” for all DFPS programs. As the central point of contact for reports of abuse, neglect and exploitation of vulnerable Texans, SWI staff are available 24 hours a day, 7 days per week, 365 days per year.

Total Average Filled Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Staff*

Intake Specialists
311.8
Supervisors
34.2
Other Staff
71.1
Total SWI Staff
417.1

Intake Specialist Demographics

Demographic Subcategory Number or Percent
Turnover Rate
n/a
16.7%
Agency Tenure
Less than 1 Year
15.8%
1-3 Years
24.8%
Greater than 3 Years
59.4%
Entry Salary*
n/a
$30,532.92
Average Age
n/a
38.3
Race/Ethnicity
African American
16.1%
Anglo
57.9%
Hispanic
24.1%
Other
1.9%

Supervisor Demographics

Demographic Subcategory Number or Percent
Turnover Rate
n/a
11.3%
Tenure as Supervisor:
Less than 1 Year
9.4%
1-3 Years
21.9%
Greater than 3 Years
68.8%
Entry Salary*
n/a
$41,416.08
Average Age
n/a
46.6
Race/Ethnicity
African American
6.3%
Anglo
62.5%
Hispanic
25.0%
Other
6.3%

SWI Expenditures*

Total SWI Staff
$20,009,687

*Source: DFPS Office of Finance and FY2016-17 LAR (plus benefit replacement pay)

Description of the Statewide Intake Process

Step 1: Contact with Statewide Intake (Phone, Fax, Mail, Internet, Walk-in/Other)
Step 2: Interview & Assessment Information about the caregiver
  • History/Ability of Caregiver
  • History of Abuse/neglect or Exploitation
Information about the victim
  • Mental, Physical, or Medical Disability
  • Age
  • Ability to Protect Self
  • Access of Alleged Perpetrator to the alleged Victim
  • Location
Information about the alleged abuse/neglect or exploitation
  • Duration/Severity of problem
  • Bodily injury or substantial risk of bodily injury
  • Type, location and degree of injury
  • Length of time victim unattended
  • Safety of surroundings
Resources available to the family General dynamics of family – strength & weaknesses
Step 3a:
Meets Statutory Definition of Abuse / Neglect / Exploitation
  • (49.2% of calls)
Actions Taken
  • Determine DFPS Program
  • Determine Priority
  • Notify Law Enforcement (CPS, CCL)
  • Notify Field Office
Step 3b:
Does not Meet Statutory Definition
of Abuse / Neglect / Exploitation
  • (50.8% of calls)
Actions Taken
  • Refer to other Agency
  • Provide Resource information
Step 3d:
Appropriate Referral Made
  • Report of Abuse/Neglect or Exploitation to APS, CPS or CCL

Back to top

Page 2

Legal Responsibility for Statewide Intake

Statutory References

Federal: Social Security Act
State: Texas Family Code, Human Resource Code

Major Functions

  • Centralized point of intake for child abuse and neglect, abuse, neglect or exploitation of people age 65 or older or adults with disabilities, clients served by DSHS or DADS employees in State Hospitals or State Supported Living Centers, and children in licensed child-care facilities or treatment centers for the entire State of Texas.
  • Open 365 days a year, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.
  • Able to receive information via phone, internet reporting system, fax, or mailed correspondence.
  • Responsibility to assess information received to the definitions of possible abuse, neglect or exploitation for each program served and to prioritize and route the information to the correct destination workload.
  • Information and Referral Service as warranted or when information received does not meet statutory definitions.
  • Generate Law Enforcement Notifications and route to the correct law enforcement jurisdiction for CPS and CCL programs.
  • Ensure confidentiality of IMPACT history and reporter identity.
  • Provide background check function for CPS caseworkers after office hours if caseworkers do not have system access to complete their own check for emergency removals.
  • Quality Assurance unit to review complaints, random call monitors and assist in development of policy, procedure and best practice.
  • Point program for identifying problems with IMPACT rollouts.
  • Provide daily reports on call volume per application; hold times per application, etc.
  • Integrate hardware and software upgrades to phone and computer systems to reduce hold times and improve efficiency.
  • Use of an IEX Workforce Management System to schedule shifts, breaks and meal times for intake workers in order to maximize efficiency.
  • Telstrat Engage call recording system utilized to record phone calls for Quality Assurance and legal requirements.
  • Employee Development Unit leads all training for new and tenured staff

Challenges

  • Respond to ever increasing number of phone calls, Internet reports, fax and mailed correspondence while keeping average hold times to 8.7 minutes or less while maintaining a high quality of intakes.
  • Increase number of bilingual staff. 
  • Reduce turnover.

Back to top

Page 3

Total Number of Contacts Received

Fiscal Year Hold Time* # of Contacts** % Change
2010
8.9
748,278
8.4%
2011
7.3
780,023
4.2%
2012
8.5
773,580
-0.8%
2013
8.1
731,163
-5.5%
2014
6.5
769,905
5.3%

"Note: Hold time is for the English phone queue only. "
Update to the code reflects a more accurate count of entries recorded in IMPACT and may not reflect information in past Data Books.

*The term "contacts" represents information received by DFPS and then entered into IMPACT system.
Information may be received in the form of a telephone call, regular mail, via Internet reporting system or via fax.
Contacts may not match number of Abuse/Neglect Intakes in respective program sections.

Total Number of Contacts Received by
Method of Receipt Fiscal Year 2014

Contact Type Number of Contacts %
Phone
608,990
79.1%
Internet
130,568
16.9%
Mail/Fax
25,243
3.3%
CPS/ICPC
3,679
0.5%
Other
877
0.1%
Data Match
489
0.1%
Walk-in
59
0.0%
State Total
769,905
100.0%

*The term "contacts" represents information received by DFPS and then entered into IMPACT system. Information may be received in the form of a telephone call, regular mail, via Internet reporting system or via fax. Contacts may not match number of Abuse/Neglect Intakes in respective program sections.

Number of Contacts by Type of Contact
Fiscal Year 2014


Total Call by Type Adult Protective Services
- In Home
Adult Protective Services - Facility Child Protective Services Residential Child Care Licensing Child Care Licensing Total % of Total
Reports of Alleged Abuse/Neglect
103,019
12,314
254,537
4,039
3,332
377,241
49.0%
Case Related Special Requests
20
0
6,327
0
0
6,347
0.8%
Non Case Related Special Requests
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
94
0.0%
Information and Referral - Related to Protective Services
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
327,129
42.5%
Information and Referral -  Not Related to Protective Services
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
59,094
7.7%
Grand Total
103,039
12,314
260,864
4,039
3,332
769,905

Note: The term "contacts" represent information received by DFPS and then entered into IMPACT system.
Information may be received in the form of a telephone call, regular mail, via Internet reporting system or via fax.

Contacts may not match number of Abuse/Neglect Intakes in respective program sections.

Back to top

Page 4

Source of Reports of Alleged Abuse/Neglect by Program

FY 14: Total

Total - Source of Report Number Percent
Medical Personnel
69,742
18.5%
School
47,765
12.7%
Relative
45,491
12.0%
Law Enforcement
42,143
11.2%
Other
28,232
7.5%
Parent
26,024
6.9%
Community Agency
24,383
6.5%
Friend-Neighbor
19,554
5.2%
Anonymous
17,749
4.7%
Victim
16,483
4.4%
DFPS Staff
10,877
2.9%
Provider
8,057
2.1%
Legal/Court
4,634
1.2%
Institutional Personnel
4,230
1.1%
Day Care Provider
2,791
0.7%
State Agency
2,729
0.7%
Financial Institution
2,337
0.6%
Parent's Paramour
1,198
0.3%
Unrelated Home Member
1,125
0.3%
24 Hour Care Provider
821
0.2%
Religious Entity
646
0.2%
Blank/Unknown
266
0.1%
Grand Total
377,277
100.0%

FY 14: CPS

CPS - Source of Report Number Percent
Medical Personnel
45,387
17.8%
School
46,563
18.3%
Relative
27,945
11.0%
Law Enforcement
36,313
14.3%
Other
18,764
7.4%
Parent
23,376
9.2%
Community Agency
8,863
3.5%
Friend-Neighbor
13,374
5.2%
Anonymous
13,815
5.4%
Victim
795
0.3%
DFPS Staff
7,569
3.0%
Provider
984
0.4%
Legal/Court
3,994
1.6%
Institutional Personnel
332
0.1%
Day Care Provider
1,941
0.8%
State Agency
1,643
0.6%
Financial Institution
23
0.0%
Parent's Paramour
1,162
0.4%
Unrelated Home Member
582
0.2%
24 Hour Care Provider
502
0.2%
Religious Entity
468
0.2%
Blank/Unknown
175
0.1%
Grand Total
254,570
100.0%

FY 14: APS In-Home

APS In-Home - Source of Report Number Percent
Medical Personnel
22,057
21.4%
School
611
0.6%
Relative
17,125
16.6%
Law Enforcement
5,181
5.0%
Other
8,000
7.8%
Parent
1,319
1.3%
Community Agency
13,805
13.4%
Friend-Neighbor
5,968
5.8%
Anonymous
2,997
2.9%
Victim
12,830
12.5%
DFPS Staff
1,716
1.7%
Provider
6,648
6.4%
Legal/Court
420
0.4%
Institutional Personnel
336
0.3%
Day Care Provider
181
0.2%
State Agency
832
0.8%
Financial Institution
2,308
2.2%
Parent's Paramour
25
0.0%
Unrelated Home Member
401
0.4%
24 Hour Care Provider
25
0.0%
Religious Entity
171
0.2%
Blank/Unknown
66
0.1%
Grand Total
103,022
100.0%

FY 14: APS Facility

APS Facility- Source of Report Number Percent
Medical Personnel
1,354
11.0%
School
135
1.1%
Relative
221
1.8%
Law Enforcement
142
1.1%
Other
847
6.9%
Parent
347
2.8%
Community Agency
1,052
8.5%
Friend-Neighbor
99
0.8%
Anonymous
699
5.7%
Victim
2,815
22.9%
DFPS Staff
393
3.2%
Provider
335
2.7%
Legal/Court
108
0.9%
Institutional Personnel
3,357
27.3%
Day Care Provider
23
0.2%
State Agency
223
1.8%
Financial Institution
4
0.0%
Parent's Paramour
0
0.0%
Unrelated Home Member
131
1.1%
24 Hour Care Provider
11
0.1%
Religious Entity
3
0.0%
Blank/Unknown
15
0.1%
Grand Total
12,314
100.0%

FY 14: CCL

CCL - Source of Report Number Percent
Medical Personnel
389
11.7%
School
89
2.7%
Relative
130
3.9%
Law Enforcement
352
10.6%
Other
301
9.0%
Parent
795
23.8%
Community Agency
92
2.7%
Friend-Neighbor
75
2.2%
Anonymous
153
4.6%
Victim
0
0.0%
DFPS Staff
287
8.6%
Provider
11
0.3%
Legal/Court
12
0.4%
Institutional Personnel
1
0.0%
Day Care Provider
602
18.1%
State Agency
11
0.3%
Financial Institution
0
0.0%
Parent's Paramour
9
0.3%
Unrelated Home Member
2
0.1%
24 Hour Care Provider
16
0.5%
Religious Entity
2
0.1%
Blank/Unknown
3
0.1%
Grand Total
3,332
100.0%

FY 14: RCCL

RCCL - Source of Report Number Percent
Medical Personnel
555
13.7%
School
367
9.1%
Relative
70
1.7%
Law Enforcement
155
3.8%
Other
320
7.9%
Parent
187
4.6%
Community Agency
571
14.1%
Friend-Neighbor
38
0.9%
Anonymous
85
2.1%
Victim
43
1.1%
DFPS Staff
912
22.6%
Provider
79
2.0%
Legal/Court
100
2.5%
Institutional Personnel
204
5.0%
Day Care Provider
44
1.1%
State Agency
20
0.5%
Financial Institution
2
0.1%
Parent's Paramour
2
0.1%
Unrelated Home Member
9
0.2%
24 Hour Care Provider
267
6.6%
Religious Entity
2
0.1%
Blank/Unknown
7
0.2%
Grand Total
4,039
100.0%

Note: Not all reports are assigned for investigation.

Page 5

Total Phone Calls - English Queue

Fiscal Year Total Calls Calls Handled Calls Abandoned* Average Time to Abandon % Abandoned
2010
442,383
297,381
145,002
6.7
32.8%
2011
435,622
317,938
117,684
5.9
27.0%
2012
442,221
310,614
131,607
6.5
29.8%
2013
426,366
308,989
117,377
6.2
27.5%
2014
433,963
335,384
98,579
5.3
22.7%

Total Phone Calls - ALL Calls

Fiscal Year Total Calls Calls Handled Calls Abandoned* Average Time to Abandon % Abandoned
2010
647,537
468,272
179,265
6.2
27.7%
2011
642,320
492,885
149,435
5.4
23.3%
2012
651,244
484,312
166,932
6.0
25.6%
2013
600,957
455,501
145,456
5.7
24.2%
2014
598,130
475,732
122,398
4.9
20.5%

*An abandoned call is a call that disconnects after completing navigation of the recorded message, but prior to being answered by an intake specialist.

NOTE: Total Phone Calls - All Calls includes Abuse Hotline (English and Spanish), Community Center, EBC, Law Enforcement, Re-Entry, and Support Staff.


Previous Section
|Back to top | Next Section